Teahose.
SIGN IN
NEW HERE — WHAT TEAHOSE DOES
We read the entire AI & tech firehose — so you don't have to.
PODPodcastsAll-In, No Priors, Acquired…
NEWNewslettersStratechery, Newcomer…
PAPPapersPhysical AI research
PHProduct Huntdaily launches
VCInvestor ScoutSequoia, a16z, Benchmark…
CLAUDE DISTILLS →
7 reads, 30 sec each — free, 6 AM ET.
+ a live graph of the companies, people & themes underneath.
HOME/THE A16Z SHOW/Workday’s Last Workday? AI and t…
POD
// EPISODE
THE A16Z SHOW

Workday’s Last Workday? AI and the Future of Enterprise Software

DATE April 30, 2026SOURCE THE A16Z SHOWPARTICIPANTS A16Z ANNOUNCER, ELENA BURGER, JOE SCHMIDT IV
// KEY TAKEAWAYS3 ITEMS
  1. 01The Great Enterprise Software Replatforming Is Now Underway
  2. 02The "Most Important, Least Loved" Paradox as the Attack Vector
  3. 03AI Revenue Reported by Incumbents Is Largely a Procurement Illusion

A16Z Podcast Summary


1. Key Themes

The Great Enterprise Software Replatforming Is Now Underway

The core thesis is that AI represents the first genuine architectural reason to rip and replace entrenched enterprise systems like Workday, ServiceNow, and Salesforce — not just build point solutions on top of them. Previous cycles only enabled Greenfield or adjacent plays; AI enables direct Brownfield competition.

"For the first time, you can actually go to a CHRO or you can go to a CIO and say, the way that this core system works for you today can be so fundamentally different. And we can change the actual way that the work is being done by your team." [00:04:08]

The "Most Important, Least Loved" Paradox as the Attack Vector

Enterprise software was built for procurement buyers and internal admins — not end users. This structural misalignment between buyer and user is the exploitable crack. Workday holds critical data but delivers a broken experience, creating massive latent demand for displacement.

"I went in actually not too long ago to like actually try to find my compensation information in Workday. It took me six and a half minutes. Like I am a technology investor." [00:06:52]

AI Revenue Reported by Incumbents Is Largely a Procurement Illusion

Workday's $400M AI ARR is being questioned as real product innovation versus financial engineering. Schmidt argues it reflects CIOs spending AI budget rather than actual agentic experiences being delivered — a critical signal that incumbents are not as far along as their metrics suggest.

"I think it's basically just a procurement innovation... flex credits are still just like a procurement innovation. There's not like actually agentic experiences that are being delivered inside people's Workday instances." [00:15:16]


2. Contrarian Perspectives

Gross Dollar Retention Is a Trap, Not Just a Moat

Most investors celebrate GDR as proof of defensibility. Schmidt reframes it: high GDR means customers are hostages, not fans. That hostage dynamic is now the attack vector for AI-native competitors who can credibly promise liberation.

"If someone has already become a customer of Workday or already become a customer of ServiceNow or Salesforce, it is so hard to rip them off. That's why these gross dollar retentions are what they are... Hey, you have been a hostage to Workday, and we will free you." [00:12:00]

Deployment Time Is the Actual Switching Cost — and It's About to Collapse

The conventional wisdom is that enterprise switching costs are about data lock-in and integrations. Schmidt argues the real barrier has been 12+ month implementation timelines — and AI-native migration tooling will compress this to 30–60 days, fundamentally changing the calculus.

"I think you can deploy a system like this and call it 30 to 60 days. Whereas historically this is 12 plus months easily. Um, and can be much longer than that and cost you a bunch of money. Like that is going to happen." [00:17:00]

The AI Adoption Map Is Still Mostly Dark — and That's the Opportunity

While the AI narrative in tech feels pervasive, Schmidt suggests actual enterprise AI adoption is still concentrated in coastal tech hubs. The mass-market inflection hasn't happened yet, making this early, not late.

"If I had a map of the United States and there's lights in the major cities — and it's like the lights indicate like who has discovered that AI can actually dramatically transform business processes... the rest of the country is kind of dark. And I think what we're going to see over the next 12, 24 months is just a dramatic brightening of that map." [00:23:18]

HR Software Is the Leading Indicator of Civilizational AI Adoption

Counterintuitively, HR — historically the slowest-moving, most conservative enterprise function — may be the best real-time signal for when AI has reached true mass-market penetration. When HR flips, the whole enterprise flips.

"I think what we're going to see over the next 12, 24 months is a dramatic brightening of that map. And I think as that happens, we're going to see HR start to swing, and that will be when we really start to see takeoff." [00:23:44]

Enterprise Software Consulting Models Are About to Be Obsoleted

The $25,000 Workday Extend license plus consultant model has been the incumbent's moat-within-a-moat. Schmidt argues that anyone who has experienced AI-native development tools will never accept that model again, and this will be a key competitive differentiator.

"Anyone who's experienced the joy and magic of like building things with cloud code is going to tell you that is going to be everywhere at some point. Like I think the days of that in enterprise software are gone." [00:18:23]


3. Companies Identified

Workday Enterprise HCM/HR platform, ~20-year-old architecture built on the cloud-native shift from PeopleSoft. Mentioned as the central subject of displacement risk — admired for its business defensibility but identified as architecturally vulnerable to AI-native replacement. 97% gross dollar retention cited.

"Workday is one of my favorite software stories ever. I think the business is unbelievably defensible until 12 months ago. I would have never thought about even writing this post." [00:14:22]

Deel Global HR and payroll platform. Called out as a portfolio company and a strong business that is NOT the direct Workday replacement play — but potentially a powerful partner to whoever builds the AI-native HCM.

"I think it's an incredible team. They're not exactly doing this play. And I think maybe the company that builds this business that we're talking about in this post could be an amazing partner with Deel over time." [00:11:33]

Mercury Banking-as-a-service platform for startups. Cited as an example of a successful Greenfield strategy disrupting an incumbent financial category — used as an analogy for what AI-native HR could do to Workday.

"There are businesses that are doing that in all these other categories, banking, right? Think of Mercury." [00:12:00]

Salesforce Enterprise CRM giant. Cited as an incumbent already taking the agent-first transition seriously, with its "headless" architecture announcement signaling a strategic pivot toward agentic workflows.

"You saw the Salesforce headless announcement. They're doing as much as they possibly can to shift towards this future." [00:18:52]

Gusto SMB payroll and HR platform. Mentioned as a Greenfield HR play but explicitly noted as NOT the enterprise Workday replacement — the opportunity described is Brownfield enterprise displacement.

"Then you talk about Gusto and the other people that are kind of building what I would call a green field type strategy for an HR system. That is an opportunity." [00:11:33]

Sana AI-powered learning and knowledge platform. Mentioned as a recent Workday acquisition, signaling that Workday is actively acquiring to shore up AI capabilities defensively.

"This is why they're fighting tooth and claw and buying businesses like Sana to try to fend this off." [00:21:49]


4. People Identified

Dave Duffield Co-founder of PeopleSoft and Workday. Cited as a canonical example of a founder who leveraged deep domain expertise and adversity (hostile takeover by Oracle) to build the definitive next-generation platform — the ideal archetype for what an AI-native HCM founder could be.

"You see them come back and say, hey, we see this shift. We just lost our baby. We know exactly what to build. We know all of the edge cases that you need to solve for." [00:08:43]

Anil Bhusri (implied as "Anil") Co-CEO/co-founder of Workday who was brought back. Mentioned as evidence of how seriously Workday is treating the competitive threat — returning a founder is a significant defensive signal.

"This is why Workday brought Anil back. This is why they've done two layoffs. This is why they're fighting tooth and claw." [00:21:49]


5. Operating Insights

Build the Wedge Around the Admin's Pain, Not the Employee's

Schmidt is precise: the initial go-to-market for an AI-native HCM shouldn't pitch the full rip-and-replace. It should target the specific daily workarounds HR administrators are already doing outside Workday — G-sheets for edge-case payroll, manual configuration for new business units — because that's where urgency and budget authority already exist.

"There's so many random things that HR administrators have to do to make Workday work on a daily basis... doing payroll for a certain type of role that doesn't have exact same parameters, so they have to do it in a G sheet." [00:17:27]

Selling "Brownfield" Requires a Different Motion Than "Greenfield"

Platform shift moments are the only time Brownfield displacement becomes viable. Operators building in competitive enterprise categories should explicitly frame their pitch as liberation from incumbency rather than net-new capability — this reframes the switching cost conversation entirely.

"It's Brownfield. Hey, you have been a hostage to Workday. We will free you with whatever new piece of software, if someone can build this in the right way." [00:12:37]

Agent Permissioning Is an Unsolved Enterprise Problem Hiding in Plain Sight

CIOs are actively grappling with how to manage agent identity, permissions, and audit trails as AI tools proliferate. Any platform that solves this credibly as part of its core architecture — not as an add-on — will have a structural advantage in enterprise sales.

"How do we do permissioning? How do we do tracking across our company as we adopt more tools? That could actually be like a backdrop of this." [00:20:52]


6. Overlooked Insights

The Org Chart Is the Hidden Data Layer for the Agentic Enterprise

Buried near the end of the conversation is a point that deserves far more attention: as companies deploy more AI agents, those agents need to understand organizational hierarchy, roles, and permissions to operate correctly. The entity that owns the canonical HR/org data becomes the identity and permissions layer for the entire agentic stack — not just an HR tool. This transforms the HCM system from a back-office record-keeper into critical infrastructure for the AI-native enterprise.

"As you have more agents doing work on behalf of humans, understanding their roles and permissions inside of the company is going to be critical. You need an agent-first core to do that. All these other third-party tools that we're adopting also need access to this information, and they need it in a clean and cohesive way." [00:20:52]

Fortune 500 Demand Already Exists — The Product Doesn't

Schmidt casually drops that he has already validated purchase intent at Fortune 500 companies for a product that does not yet exist. This is an extraordinarily rare signal — pre-product demand from the hardest buyers in the world — and suggests the first credible AI-native HCM to reach enterprise-readiness will face a compressed sales cycle rather than the typical multi-year enterprise adoption curve.

"I talked to a bunch of Fortune 500 and also private companies that use Workday. And I told them the kind of business that I think should exist. And some of them were like, I would buy this from you if it existed right now." [00:13:06]