Teahose.
SIGN IN
NEW HERE — WHAT TEAHOSE DOES
We read the entire AI & tech firehose — so you don't have to.
PODPodcastsAll-In, No Priors, Acquired…
NEWNewslettersStratechery, Newcomer…
PAPPapersPhysical AI research
PHProduct Huntdaily launches
VCInvestor ScoutSequoia, a16z, Benchmark…
CLAUDE DISTILLS →
7 reads, 30 sec each — free, 6 AM ET.
+ a live graph of the companies, people & themes underneath.
HOME/INVEST LIKE THE BEST/Ramtin Naimi on the State of Ven…
POD
// EPISODE
INVEST LIKE THE BEST

Ramtin Naimi on the State of Venture Investing - [Invest Like the Best, EP.499]

DATE November 6, 2026SOURCE INVEST LIKE THE BESTPARTICIPANTS AD NARRATOR, PATRICK O'SHAUGHNESSY, RAMTIN NAIMI
// KEY TAKEAWAYS6 ITEMS
  1. 01The "Secondary Tranche" Is Now Structural, Not a Warning Sign
  2. 02Markups Are Table Stakes, and the Treadmill Is Psychologically Brutal
  3. 03Hypergrowth Revenue Always Comes with an Asterisk, So Benchmark Within Your Style
  4. 04The Labor-Replacement TAM Reframes Vertical Software Multiples
  5. 05Mega-Funds Dramatically Underestimated Capital Needs, Compressing Fundraising Cycles
  6. 06LP "Venture Exposure" Is Really Exposure to Three or Four Names
In this episode

1. Key Themes

The "Secondary Tranche" Is Now Structural, Not a Warning Sign

Losing firms no longer wait for the next round. They pay up immediately alongside the primary. Ramtin argues this is a feature of capital-intensive companies rather than a bubble symptom. In 2021 the fast-follow came weeks later at 2X; now it happens in tandem at 3-5X.

Ramtin Naimi: "In this market, it's like, 'Okay, we lost this round, but we don't want to wait for the next round. What do we need to pay to get into this financing today?' And it's usually not 2X. It's usually like 3- to 4- to 5X happening in tandem with the primary." 00:02:47

Ramtin Naimi: "these companies are so capital-intensive that they actually need that level of capital, and they don't want to raise all that in that primary tranche. So I don't think that tranching is a thing that's an unhealthy sign of the market." 00:03:11

Markups Are Table Stakes, and the Treadmill Is Psychologically Brutal

The pace of value creation means a markup no longer signals outperformance, only that you are keeping up. Record exits become two-day news stories.

Ramtin Naimi: "In this market, getting markups is the bare minimum requirement to be keeping up. So the point where markups don't even feel like good anymore, markups just feel like you're keeping pace with the state of the market." 00:04:09

Ramtin Naimi: "you're seeing exits that are the largest in history happen, and then it's news for like two days and people move on to the next thing." 00:04:31

Hypergrowth Revenue Always Comes with an Asterisk, So Benchmark Within Your Style

Every company growing 10-20X has a quality caveat: low or negative margins, customer concentration, annualized data sales, consumer rather than enterprise revenue, or usage-based rather than contractual revenue. Founders should compare themselves to peers of the same type. Margins are improving fast.

Ramtin Naimi: "any company that's growing at that rate has something interesting about their revenue. It's not a clear, clean, pure-play SaaS revenue, 90%-plus gross margins, annualized recurring revenue contracts." 00:04:51

Ramtin Naimi: "We have companies in our portfolio that are going to grow 200- to 700 this year, but their margin profiles are going from -15% to +35%. So you're getting massive revenue growth and margin growth simultaneously." 00:06:21

The Labor-Replacement TAM Reframes Vertical Software Multiples

100X revenue multiples on vertical SaaS only make sense if you stop comparing to software budgets and start comparing to labor budgets.

Ramtin Naimi: "you look at the total amount of money that law firms spend on software every year, and you're like, 'Oh, these companies can't be that big, actually.' But you look at how much money that these law firms spend on paralegals every year, and you're like, 'Oh, that's actually a really big number.' So if these companies can capture 20% of that, the scale works." 00:06:43

Mega-Funds Dramatically Underestimated Capital Needs, Compressing Fundraising Cycles

Platform funds modeled 18-24 month deployment windows and are burning through them roughly 3X faster, because they want more companies, at higher prices, with more capital needed per company to hit ownership targets. The result is a trade-off between ownership and shots on goal.

Ramtin Naimi: "the mega platform funds that you guys hear about that are raising these record-size funds have probably raised two to three times in that same 18- to 24-month window. So like their deployment periods are about 3X faster than they thought they would be." 00:10:47

Ramtin Naimi: "I know one fund that raised $2.5 billion and started deploying in July and told me they're going to be back in market in January. I know of another fund where my LPs told me they gave them $3 billion nine months ago and now they're back looking for $5 billion." 00:13:59

LP "Venture Exposure" Is Really Exposure to Three or Four Names

Liquidity depends on whether your funds hold SpaceX, Anthropic, OpenAI, or Databricks. Everything else is not returning much cash, which pushes funds toward alternative capital sources.

Ramtin Naimi: "it's not 30- to 40% of their 50% of their AUM in venture capital, it's 30- to 50% of their AUM in like three to four companies. And it's SpaceX, Anthropic, and OpenAI, and Databricks." 00:12:37

Ramtin Naimi: "Outside of exposure to those companies, LPs aren't getting much liquidity back at all." 00:13:17

Funding Delays Are the New Fine Print

Term sheets are being issued before the money exists. Founders are being told funding will arrive months later.

Ramtin Naimi: "the VCs are giving them term sheets and saying, 'Hey, we want to put $150 million in your company. Is it okay if we fund it in like mid-January?', which is three months from now." 00:14:36

Ramtin Naimi: "these guys are committing deals before they even have the money to finance them." 00:15:11

Compute Is the Binding Constraint, and the Debt Market (Not Equity) Is the Real Governor

Small buyers can't get compute because large neoclouds ignore deals under roughly $200 million. The neolab segment now numbers 80-90 companies, each needing multiples of its equity raise in debt.

Ramtin Naimi: "A lot of the largest neoclouds... aren't really interested in engaging with compute deals that are like sub-$200 million in scale." 00:20:49

Ramtin Naimi: "I think a lot of these guys that are building these things, they need debt in excess of 5- to 10X of the equity that they raised. Given what had happened in public markets with some of the neoclouds in the past couple of weeks, I think their cost for debt is going to increase." 00:23:19

Valuation Anchoring Is the Most Erratic It Has Ever Been

The goalpost for "best case outcome" has moved from $10B (2016) to $100B (2021) to $1T (now), and pricing has followed, with enormous dispersion on any given deal.

Ramtin Naimi: "in a best case scenario, this company could have a trillion-dollar outcome. Now, between SpaceX and Anthropic and OpenAI, you have three trillion-dollar companies. My bet is there might be two to three more, and not 40 more." 00:24:12

Ramtin Naimi: "I think you can get a term sheet as low as here and as high as here, and that's like a 4X difference in price." 00:31:38

Frothiness 6.5-7 vs. Opportunity Set 10

His scorecard: opportunity set is a 10 in a nearly 10-year career, and frothiness is 6.5-7 (2021 was a 10), because fundamentals partly justify the heat.

Ramtin Naimi: "In terms of opportunity set, it's a 10. In terms of frothiness, I would call 2021 a 10, and I would probably call this market a 6.5 to 7, because while the frothiness is there, there is also a lot to justify the frothiness." 00:43:44

2. Contrarian Perspectives

"Easy Money" Late-Stage Passive Investing in Consensus Winners Is Becoming a Crowded Trade

Most people see backing the obvious mega-companies as the safe play. Ramtin sees the strategy itself becoming the risk, since it is now the consensus approach to raising and deploying large funds.

Ramtin Naimi: "I've seen a record number of VC firms in the last 18 months hone in on the same idea of there's a handful of obviously great companies that can absorb a huge amount of capital. And as a VC, if you can demonstrate access to these names, you can raise large funds and become a passive investor." 00:34:18

Ramtin Naimi: "I can't really think of many times in history where like an easy strategy turned out to also be a good strategy long term." 00:34:39

He still concedes it can be top quartile: Stripe from $100B to $179B is an "11-, 12% IRR over five years, which... is still better than like the bottom 75% of venture." 00:33:36

Backing Great Founders on Obvious Ideas Is the Losing Move; Alpha Comes from Being Proactive

Reactive investing yields top-quartile at best; proactive investing yields top 5%. Founders are "early, not wrong."

Ramtin Naimi: "reactive, if you pick correctly, allows you to be a top quartile manager, and I think being proactive allows you to be a top 5% manager." 00:26:08

Ramtin Naimi: "smart people generally tend to understand markets well before the market starts to pay attention to them." 00:28:14

Few Term Sheets From Elite Investors on a Brilliant Founder Is a Buy Signal

A founder with many meetings but few conversions is probably not a bad founder, just an early idea that VCs didn't want to learn about. Etched's Gavin Uberti and Conduit are the examples.

Ramtin Naimi: "if that company walks away from those meetings with a small number of conversions, it's probably not because everybody thought it was actually a bad founder... it's because people walked away thinking it wasn't that interesting of an opportunity." 00:30:17

Ramtin Naimi: "Conduit raised a very large round, highly oversubscribed, 13 term sheets, because now it's a great team working on a market that everyone cares about." 00:27:34

The Data-Selling Business Is Not a Trade; It's a Decades-Long Category

The conventional view is that model builders will eventually have all the data they need. Ramtin rejects that.

Ramtin Naimi: "I think people have dramatically underestimated the data needs of these model builders. It seems that their data needs are only increasing." 00:35:23

Ramtin Naimi: "I just believe data is a gigantic business and we can continue selling data for the next 10, 15, 20 years and collect tens of billions of dollars of revenue." 00:35:58

Funds Should Be Bigger, Not Smaller: "We've Always Raised Our Funds Too Small"

Fund-size discipline is conventionally treated as a virtue. Ramtin says his biggest mistake was under-raising, since winners were capital-constrained rather than allocation-constrained.

Ramtin Naimi: "in almost all of them, we were never allocation-constrained, we were capital-constrained." 00:40:04

Ramtin Naimi: "in every single fund that we've had, I could have maintained an identical return profile with probably 2X the capital we had there." 00:41:54

3. Companies Identified

Conduit

Brain-computer interface startup building a non-invasive wearable (over the ear/head) that decodes thoughts, as opposed to Neuralink's implant. Ramtin seeded it nine months ago. Mentioned as the prime example of backing a brilliant founder before the category became obvious; the round was later oversubscribed with 13 term sheets.

Ramtin Naimi: "These guys are extracting brain information via a product you wear on top of your head." 00:26:55

Ramtin Naimi: "now they have 30,000 hours of human training data... now they're going to go do a million-hour training data run, if their scaling laws hold, you could see a world where 5, 10 years from now, you and I have a little device that we wear over our ear that understands our thoughts and communicates with our agent." 00:27:34

Etched

AI chip startup founded by Gavin Uberti. Illustrates a market that was obvious to the founder before it was obvious to investors; Sequoia's $10B valuation reset perception and lifted every chip company.

Ramtin Naimi: "it wasn't until Sequoia blessed him with a $10 billion valuation that everyone was like, 'Oh, wait a second. Now we actually believe that startups will totally run circles around the incumbents on this market.'" 00:28:56

NewLimit

Longevity/biotech company, named as a next-generation company to own from this vintage with 500B-to-trillion-dollar potential.

Ramtin Naimi: "I would put like NewLimit and Chai Discovery really high up on there." 00:44:06

Chai Discovery

AI-native drug discovery company, named alongside NewLimit and Isomorphic as a candidate for the AI-native next-gen Genentech.

Ramtin Naimi: "can you build AI-native next-gen Genentech? And the market opportunity for those companies is 500 billion to trillion-dollar outcomes." 00:44:06

Isomorphic Labs

AI drug discovery company, named as "really high up" in bio.

Ramtin Naimi: "Isomorphic, really high up on there, in terms of bio." 00:44:06

Applied Compute

Company pioneering the idea of enterprises owning their own data, knowledge, and intelligence. Named as the category leader.

Ramtin Naimi: "the idea of owning your own data, owning your own knowledge, intelligence is a really unique idea. And I think the company that probably pioneered that, as the leader in the category, is Applied Compute." 00:44:27

Polymarket

Prediction market. Abstract was a big investor in the Series B. Ramtin highlights it as a true consumer business growing at "insane" rates that isn't even an AI company.

Ramtin Naimi: "the rate at which those companies are growing is insane, and they're not even AI companies. They're just true consumer businesses." 00:44:51

Physical Intelligence

Robotics foundation model company. Named for its team, talent magnetism and retention.

Ramtin Naimi: "I think that could be a multi-$100 billion, trillion-dollar company. Exceptional team, a huge magnet for talent, huge ability to retain exceptional talent." 00:44:51

Databricks

Data/AI platform; Ramtin is described as a big shareholder. Cited among the few names that drive LP liquidity and as an example of a simpler-to-underwrite late-stage company.

Ramtin Naimi: "It's SpaceX, Anthropic, and OpenAI, and Databricks, a number of companies like that. Those are the names that need to generate liquidity for these guys." 00:12:58

Anthropic

Frontier model lab. Referenced for its S-1: $140B raised, $10B spent, $132B on the balance sheet, with 85% gross margins per Patrick. One of the three "trillion-dollar" companies.

Patrick O'Shaughnessy: "they've raised 140 billion and they've spent 10 of that and they have 132 billion on the balance sheet." 00:15:38

OpenAI

Frontier lab; one of the three companies Ramtin counts as trillion-dollar outcomes and as a key liquidity driver for LPs.

Ramtin Naimi: "between SpaceX and Anthropic and OpenAI, you have three trillion-dollar companies." 00:24:52

SpaceX

Named as a trillion-dollar company and a primary driver of LP liquidity.

Ramtin Naimi: "If you're an LP that wasn't in a fund that had a lot of exposure to SpaceX, you haven't gotten any liquidity." 00:13:17

Stripe

Used as a benchmark for buying great companies at high prices: from $100B in 2021 to $179B, an 11-12% IRR over five years.

Ramtin Naimi: "Stripe was a great company, still is a great company, arguably one of the best. But today, Stripe is $179 billion." 00:33:36

Crusoe

AI infrastructure/neocloud company; Abstract made a passive growth investment.

Ramtin Naimi: "we've also made some passive growth investments into companies like Crusoe." 00:39:17

xAI

Elon Musk's AI company. Abstract put about 15% of its 2023 vintage fund into the formation round.

Ramtin Naimi: "We put, I think, like 15% of our 2023 vintage fund into the formation round of xAI." 00:39:37

Socket

Company where Abstract led a Series B.

Ramtin Naimi: "We've led some Series B financings in companies like Socket." 00:39:17

Doctronic

Abstract led a Series B financing.

Ramtin Naimi: "companies like Doctronic or Dust." 00:39:17

Dust

Abstract led a Series B financing.

Ramtin Naimi: "companies like Doctronic or Dust." 00:39:17

Neuralink

Invasive BCI company; the contrast case to Conduit's non-invasive approach.

Ramtin Naimi: "Neuralink is implanting chips into your brain and they get perfect readouts as a result." 00:26:55

General Catalyst (the "GC" Customer Value Fund)

Referenced for its financing product: capital that funds growth if it can be shown that $10M unlocks $30M of revenue. Cited as the proof that new capital structures can work, though it needed years of founder education.

Ramtin Naimi: "If you could prove that for every $10 million, that unlocks $30 million of revenue, we'll give you the money to finance that." 00:16:30

Nvidia

Referenced for compute allocation scarcity (Vera Rubin and prior generations).

Patrick O'Shaughnessy: "literally nobody can seem to get generation prior, let alone current generation, Vera Rubin or something, allocation from Nvidia." 00:20:19

Abstract Ventures

Ramtin's firm. Grew from a $100M Fund I (2018) to an $800M latest fund, moving from pure seed into Series A-C and passive growth.

Ramtin Naimi: "our first fund was $100 million. The latest one we just raised is $800 million." 00:39:37

Sequoia

Its $10B valuation of Etched is cited as the event that reset market perception of AI chip startups.

Ramtin Naimi: "it wasn't until Sequoia blessed him with a $10 billion valuation..." 00:28:56

Airbnb, DoorDash

Named as 2021-era companies approaching $100B valuations that reset the goalposts.

Ramtin Naimi: "you had Stripe and Databricks and Airbnb and DoorDash approaching $100 billion valuations." 00:24:28

4. People Identified

Gavin Uberti

Founder of Etched. Cited as a founder everyone found brilliant, whose market was dismissed until Sequoia's validation.

Ramtin Naimi: "I don't think there's a single VC who met Gavin that didn't think he was brilliant. But a lot of people just assumed a startup company cannot outcompete incumbents on like AI chip fabrication." 00:28:36

Elon Musk

Referenced for his claim about stranded compute capacity, and for xAI.

Patrick O'Shaughnessy: "you've got Elon saying there's going to be all this stranded capacity in compute." 00:20:19

Ramtin Naimi

Founder of Abstract Ventures. Described by a mutual LP as the person from whom they learn the most per minute about venture markets.

Patrick O'Shaughnessy: "One of our mutual LPs describes you as the person from whom he learns the most per minute about what's going on in venture markets." 00:01:42

Conduit's Founders

Unnamed in the transcript. Described as brilliant and early to BCI.

Ramtin Naimi: "anybody who met those founders would have told you they were brilliant. But nine months ago, nobody in the Valley really cared about BCI as a category." 00:26:55

5. Operating Insights

Compute-for-Equity: Guarantee the Allocation, Bundle the Scarce Input

Some VCs are financing companies with compute rather than cash, which founders actually prefer since the cash would be spent on compute anyway. The complications are procurement, pricing, usage rights (perpetual vs. one training run), and depreciation.

Ramtin Naimi: "they're like, 'Hey, if you bring us compute instead of cash, you guaranteed your allocation this round because we're going to take this money and spend it on computer regardless.'" 00:17:08

Offer Founders a Number They Don't Need to Shop

Abstract's lead-the-round playbook: build trust early, show up outside a traditional process, and take enough of the round that the founder only needs pro rata from existing investors.

Ramtin Naimi: "Having a relationship with a founder that trusts you, and knowing them early, and showing up outside of a traditional financing process, and giving them a number that they don't feel like they need to shop, and taking enough of the round that they don't feel like they need to do much besides go ask their other investors for pro rata is probably the most easy way for us to continue piling capital into our value-driving positions." 00:40:28

Size the Next Fund Off Deployable Capital at the Same Quality

A disciplined fundraising rule: six months before going to market, compare current position in the market to the last raise, and ask whether you can deploy more capital into equal or better companies without hurting returns.

Ramtin Naimi: "Do we believe that we can deploy more capital into the same quality of companies, if not greater quality of companies, than we were in the previous vintage? And if so, do we believe we can... raise a larger fund without compromising on the return profile?" 00:41:35

Talent Density and Retention as the Leading Indicator

Ramtin's strongest conviction signal is a company's ability to retain top talent that could earn more elsewhere.

Ramtin Naimi: "retaining the highest quality talent is probably the single hardest thing you have to do as a company building in venture, because the best people you have at your company can get a job anywhere they want at a higher comp and equity package than you're paying them." 00:45:15

Calibrate Founder Benchmarks to Peers

When advising founders discouraged by headline growth numbers, tell them to compare within their company style, not against absolute top-line figures.

Ramtin Naimi: "you need to actually compare your revenue growth to companies within your style of company versus the absolute top-line figures." 00:05:40

6. Overlooked Insights

Public-Market Investors and Bad Deal Behavior Are Early-Cycle Tells, and Renegotiations Are Spiking Now

Almost in passing, Ramtin lists the 2021 late-cycle markers (public-market investors aggressively entering venture, term sheets pulled or renegotiated) and says he has seen more renegotiated deals in the last 6-8 weeks than since 2021. Combined with the funding-delay phenomenon (term sheets issued with money arriving months later), this suggests the plumbing of the market is under strain even while headline enthusiasm is at a 10.

Ramtin Naimi: "in the last 6, 7, 8 weeks, I've probably seen a larger amount of deals get renegotiated after being offered than I have since 2021." 00:08:44

The Public-Market Neocloud Selloff Is the Transmission Mechanism to Private Compute Demand

Buried in the compute discussion is the key causal chain: neolabs need debt of 5-10X their equity, neocloud stocks just had a rough stretch, so the cost of debt rises, which can throttle the whole stack even if equity keeps flowing. Ramtin's single sharpest claim about what would actually break the build-out is the debt terms, not the equity availability.

Ramtin Naimi: "it's less about whether these companies are able to raise the equity they need to produce this compute for the demand is going to be more along: Could they raise the debt they need at terms that make sense for like business viability to continue for the show to go on?" 00:23:34