Teahose.
SIGN IN
NEW HERE — WHAT TEAHOSE DOES
We read the entire AI & tech firehose — so you don't have to.
PODPodcastsAll-In, No Priors, Acquired…
NEWNewslettersStratechery, Newcomer…
PAPPapersPhysical AI research
PHProduct Huntdaily launches
VCInvestor ScoutSequoia, a16z, Benchmark…
CLAUDE DISTILLS →
7 reads, 30 sec each — free, 6 AM ET.
+ a live graph of the companies, people & themes underneath.
HOME/ALL IN/Blake Scholl: Why Plane Speed St…
POD
// EPISODE
ALL IN

Blake Scholl: Why Plane Speed Stalled, Supersonic Commercial Flight, & Revolutionizing the Engine

DATE September 22, 2026SOURCE ALL INPARTICIPANTS BLAKE SCHOLL
// KEY TAKEAWAYS6 ITEMS
  1. 01Big Incumbents Have Stalled, Creating a Vacuum for Startups
  2. 02Small, Dense Teams Can Outbuild Giant Legacy Organizations
  3. 03Regulatory Bans Can Be Reversed When the Underlying Technical Objection Disappears
  4. 04A "Failure" Can Become the Foundation of the Business Model
  5. 05Vertical Integration in Manufacturing as a Re-Industrialization Strategy
  6. 06Cross-Industry Optionality: Aerospace Engine Tech Repurposed for Data Center Power

1. Key Themes

Big Incumbents Have Stalled, Creating a Vacuum for Startups

Boeing hasn't launched a genuinely new airplane platform in over two decades, and Scholl frames this stagnation as the opening for a startup to leapfrog an industry giant. "Boeing hasn't built a new airplane in 20 years... it's David and Goliath, but Goliath is like asleep." 00:00:07 He drives the point home with a generational marker: "we have interns born after the last time Boeing launched a new airplane in 2004." 00:01:18

Small, Dense Teams Can Outbuild Giant Legacy Organizations

Boom built and flew a supersonic jet with a fraction of the headcount of traditional aerospace programs. "Something that the big companies that have put thousands of people on, we did with just 50 really dedicated men and women." 00:03:15

Regulatory Bans Can Be Reversed When the Underlying Technical Objection Disappears

The 1973 supersonic overland ban existed because of sonic boom; Boom's "boomless cruise" technique removed the objection, which directly enabled a policy reversal — first via executive order, then unanimous congressional action. "So that ban that started in 1973 actually ended June 6th of last year... The Supersonic Legalization Act passed the House... it's actually unanimous." 00:05:32

A "Failure" Can Become the Foundation of the Business Model

Publicly breaking up with Rolls-Royce over engine outsourcing was seen as fatal, but building an in-house engine turned into Boom's most valuable, cash-generating asset. "One of the dumbest things I ever did was try to outsource our engine development to a big old company... We broke up with Rolls Royce very publicly and people said we were doomed. So we decided to do the thing everyone said was really impossible." 00:06:29

Vertical Integration in Manufacturing as a Re-Industrialization Strategy

Scholl positions Boom's engine factory as a philosophical rejection of the outsourcing model that dominates legacy aerospace, aiming to build sovereign US manufacturing capability rather than merely reshoring old techniques. "Our philosophy is the exact opposite of what you find at every legacy big company, with lots of outsourcing and a return on net assets philosophy that makes you spin out your crown jewels." 00:09:10

Cross-Industry Optionality: Aerospace Engine Tech Repurposed for Data Center Power

By removing the fan and adding a generator, Boom's supersonic engine core becomes a mobile power-generation unit — an entirely separate, faster-monetizing business line born from the aerospace R&D. "It turns out if we take our supersonic engine technology... and we take the fan off the front and instead we put a generator in the back... we can deploy 42 megawatts for behind-the-meter power generation." 00:08:16

Speed and Access With Administrations Matter More Than Ideology

Scholl highlights that supersonic legalization moved through Congress unanimously and through the executive branch in days, suggesting infrastructure/aerospace policy can be a rare bipartisan lever, and that political access can be won through momentum, not lobbying tenure. "It was, we broke, literally we broke the sound barrier on Monday... By the time I landed, I had an invitation to the West Wing. So that's Tuesday... By Thursday, our airplane model has made it to the Oval Office." 00:16:36

2. Contrarian Perspectives

Jeff Bezos Was Publicly Wrong About What Startups Can Build

Bezos passed on Boom's seed round and wrote in Amazon's 2015 shareholder letter that "you're not going to build an all-composite airliner in your garage startup." Scholl took this as a personal challenge and proceeded to become "the first private company ever to build a supersonic jet." 00:02:44 This is a direct rebuttal to conventional wisdom (even from one of the most respected operators alive) that capital-intensive, physical hardware categories are closed to startups.

The Water Objection to New Power Generation Is "Kind of Bullshit"

Rather than debate water usage concerns around data center power (a major current ESG/infrastructure battleground), Scholl argues the objection is largely pretextual and simply engineers it away by using a hot-running engine core that doesn't need water. "I think we all know the water thing is kind of a bullshit objection, but why not make it go away?" 00:08:45

Predictability Is Overrated Versus Speed

Against the instinct to give firm, defensible timelines (especially to investors/press), Scholl argues that moving fast and being honest about uncertainty beats false precision. "I think I've learned along the way is it's more important to be fast than to be predictable." 00:11:21

Expertise Can Be a Liability, Not an Asset

In the cold open, Scholl challenges the premise that domain experts are best positioned to innovate in their field — arguing expertise anchors people to outdated paradigms rather than what's possible next. "The moment you become an expert, what you're steeped in is the past, and then you're completely useless." 00:00:07

3. Companies Identified

Boom Supersonic — Startup building the Overture supersonic airliner and its own jet engines; built and flew the XB-1, the first privately developed jet to break the sound barrier, using only ~50 people, and is now vertically integrating engine manufacturing at scale. Mentioned as the founder's own company and central subject of the entire talk. "This whole airplane was built by essentially 50 people." 00:00:07

Boeing — Legacy commercial aircraft manufacturer, cited as the dormant incumbent that hasn't launched a genuinely new airplane platform since 2004 and whose latest airliner is described as "a literal carbon fiber copy of their first" 707. Mentioned as the symbol of stalled aerospace innovation. 00:01:18

Rolls-Royce — Legacy jet engine manufacturer that Boom originally partnered with to build Overture's engine; the partnership publicly dissolved, which Scholl now frames as catalyzing Boom's superior in-house engine strategy. "We broke up with Rolls Royce very publicly and people said we were doomed." 00:06:29

Amazon / SpaceX / Tesla (Elon Musk reference) — Referenced via Bezos (Scholl's former employer) and Elon Musk, who reposted Scholl's tweet about breaking the sound barrier and is a potential customer for Boom's new data-center power product for Colossus. "Did you talk to Elon about it? Is he interested for the Colossus?" 00:13:31

United Airlines — Cited as an example of an airline customer that would earn margin above Boom's break-even fare on supersonic routes. "Any dollar above that, United's making some good money." 00:11:17

Gulfstream / Falcon (Dassault) — Referenced as incumbent private jet manufacturers that Boom suggests should (or will) enter the supersonic private jet market. "I hope the private jet guys will make a supersonic jet they should. If they don't, I guess we'll do it." 00:14:32

4. People Identified

Blake Scholl — Founder and CEO of Boom Supersonic; former software engineer/ads executive at Amazon and Groupon with no traditional aerospace background, who built a company that became the first private entity to fly a supersonic jet. Mentioned as the guest and central figure of the talk, notable for pursuing an "impossible" hardware category as an outsider. "12 years ago, I was a software engineer and an ads guy from Amazon and Groupon. The idea that somebody with nothing more than a pilot's license could do something about this seemed laughable." 00:01:48

Jeff Bezos — Founder of Amazon and Scholl's former employer; passed on Boom's seed round in 2015 and publicly doubted a startup could build a composite airliner. Mentioned as a foil/skeptic whose public doubt motivated Scholl. "In 2015, I pitched my old big boss, Jeff Bezos, on Boom's seed round. And he passed." 00:02:13

Elon Musk — Mentioned as reposting Scholl's tweet about breaking the sound barrier, helping accelerate political momentum, and as a potential customer for Boom's data-center power generation product via Colossus. "I tweeted about it. Elon reposted my tweet." 00:16:36

5. Operating Insights

Turn a Public "Failure" Into Your Core Competitive Moat

When the Rolls-Royce partnership collapsed publicly and pundits declared the company "doomed," Boom didn't retreat to find another supplier — it committed to full vertical integration of engine design and manufacturing. This decision, made under duress, became the source of Boom's most valuable and fastest-monetizing asset (the data-center power business). The lesson for operators: when a partnership breaks down publicly, treat it as a forcing function for a structurally superior (if harder) path rather than seeking a face-saving replacement deal.

Build a Second, Faster-Cash-Flow Business as a Byproduct of Deep R&D

Boom's core aerospace engine R&D — a multi-year, pre-revenue endeavor — generated a spinout product (mobile power generation for data centers) that appears to have immediate, overwhelming commercial demand. "There are tens of gigawatts of demand in my inbox." 00:13:23 Operators building long-duration, capital-intensive technology should actively look for adjacent, shorter-payback applications of their core IP to fund the primary mission and de-risk the balance sheet.

Use a Moment of Momentum to Compress Political/Regulatory Timelines

Scholl's account of the 72-hour sequence — breaking the sound barrier, tweeting, flying to DC, getting a West Wing invite, and reaching the Oval Office within days — shows that regulatory access can be won opportunistically at the peak of a public moment rather than through years of conventional lobbying. Founders navigating regulated industries should treat major technical milestones as immediate, time-sensitive political capital to be spent fast.

Neutralize Objections by Engineering Them Away, Not Debating Them

Rather than making a PR/lobbying case that data center water usage is acceptable, Boom designed its engine to run hot and require no water at all, eliminating the controversy structurally. This is a repeatable playbook: when facing a recurring stakeholder objection, look for an engineering or design change that makes the objection factually moot rather than spending resources arguing against it.

6. Overlooked Insights

The Real Business Model Might Not Be the One in the Pitch

The line that gets a laugh ("is that a turbine blade in your pocket?") masks a much bigger strategic pivot: Boom appears to be transitioning, in practice, into a power-generation/energy infrastructure company that happens to also be building a supersonic jet. The data-center power business was described as having overwhelming, immediate, monetizable demand ("an incredible money printing business... I've never seen a demand like this for anything else in my life" 00:13:16) while the airplane itself is still years from revenue. This suggests the market may currently be underpricing Boom as an "aerospace startup" when its near-term economic engine could actually be an energy infrastructure company — a distinction few observers (including the interviewers) probed further.

Bipartisan, Unanimous Legislation as a Hidden Signal for Infrastructure Investing

The detail that the Supersonic Legalization Act passed the House unanimously and cleared Senate Commerce unanimously is treated as a light aside, but it's a meaningful signal: aerospace/infrastructure re-industrialization has become one of the few genuinely bipartisan investment themes in Washington right now, unlike most tech or energy policy. "It's actually unanimous... And it got out of Senate commerce unanimously recently." 00:06:02 Investors screening for policy-tailwind sectors should note that supersonic/advanced manufacturing legislation is moving with a rare lack of political friction, implying lower regulatory risk than most emerging infrastructure categories.