Emerging Manager Q&A: Jason Zins about $50M Nomi Defense Fund I

---

1. Key Themes

Theme 1: Defense Tech as a Growth-Stage Investment Gap

There is a structural void between early-stage defense VCs and large-cap institutional growth investors — and Nomi is deliberately positioning in that gap with $2M–$10M checks at Series B and beyond.

"Early-stage defense VCs fight over first checks. Tier-1 growth investors only show up for $100M+ mega-rounds. Nomi deliberately parks itself in between – Series B onward, $2M–$10M checks."

---

Theme 2: Hardware-First Defense Thesis Built Around Great Power Conflict

Nomi's heaviest portfolio concentration is manufacturing, premised on the idea that critical-shortage hardware delivers battlefield impact before more sophisticated systems do.

"The thesis here is straightforward: critical-shortage hardware moves the needle in a great power conflict before the exquisite systems do."

---

Theme 3: HNW/Family Office LP Base as a Strategic Structural Advantage

Rather than targeting institutional allocators with slow committee processes, Nomi built a ~150-person cap table of high-net-worth individuals, family offices, and RIAs — enabling speed and long hold periods.

"Rather than chasing institutional allocators, Nomi built its cap table around roughly 150 HNWIs, family offices, and RIAs from Zins' SkyBridge network. The advantage is structural – these LPs move fast, hold long, and don't need committee approval. That translates directly into co-investment speed when a high-conviction deal surfaces."

---

Theme 4: Complementary Operator + Financier Teams as a Competitive Moat

The Nomi partnership pairs deep financial and LP network experience (Wall Street) with hands-on military and startup operating experience (Special Ops + Goldman + venture). This combination is positioned as the core differentiator for winning competitive rounds.

"One partner understands how capital moves. The other understands what the military actually needs."

"We combine deep technical underwriting of defense and dual-use technology with the relationships and reputation to win allocations in competitive rounds."

---

2. Contrarian Perspectives

Contrarian Take 1: Institutional LPs Are a Trap for Emerging Managers

The consensus for emerging fund managers is to pursue institutional LPs (endowments, pension funds, large family offices) for credibility and check size. Zins argues this is a mistake — smaller, networked HNW LPs close faster and behave better as long-term partners.

"Only chasing the big LPs, ignoring investors who don't look obvious on paper and getting discouraged by a slow start" is the biggest mistake fund managers make.

The evidence: Nomi closed a $50M fund in just six months with no placement agent, relying entirely on an existing HNWI network — and had over $20M deployed across six companies by close.

---

Contrarian Take 2: Manufacturing is More Valuable Than "Exquisite" Defense Tech

Conventional defense tech investment attention gravitates toward cutting-edge AI, autonomy, and advanced weapons systems. Nomi's thesis inverts this — manufacturing and supply chain is the heaviest concentration in the fund, on the premise that supply chain gaps matter more than technological elegance in near-term conflict scenarios.

"The thesis here is straightforward: critical-shortage hardware moves the needle in a great power conflict before the exquisite systems do."

The five domains covered are: Autonomy & Unmanned Systems, AI & Communications, Manufacturing & Supply Chain, Space Technologies, and Energy & Power — with manufacturing explicitly called out as the top concentration.

---

Contrarian Take 3: Secondaries in Defense Are an Underutilized Tool

Most defense-focused venture funds focus exclusively on primary equity. Nomi pairs primary positions with selective secondary stakes in proven late-stage names — a less common tactic at this fund size that provides exposure to de-risked assets with compressed time-to-liquidity.

"The fund targets companies at the inflection point between R&D and real revenue, combining primary equity positions with selective secondary stakes in proven late-stage names."

---

3. Companies Identified

---

4. People Identified

---

5. Operating Insights

Insight 1: Treat Fundraising as an Operations Process, Not Relationship Management

Zins' top piece of advice for emerging managers reframes fundraising entirely — it is a systematic, CRM-driven operation, not an art form dependent on charisma or momentum.

"Build a real CRM from day one and be diligent about using it. Fundraising is an operations process, not just a vibes exercise."

Insight 2: The Strongest LP Buying Signals Are Behavioral, Not Verbal

LPs who are truly interested exhibit specific actions rather than just enthusiasm. Managers should monitor for referrals, process questions, and wire requests as the real closing signals — not positive sentiment.

Top 3 signals a LP was truly interested: "1. They referred us to a friend. 2. They asked about subscription process at end of call. 3. 'Send me the wire instructions.'"

Insight 3: Don't Qualify Out Non-Obvious LPs

The fastest check in Nomi's fund closed after a single phone call with documents signed the next day — proving that unconventional or less prestigious LPs can move at speeds institutional investors never can.

"Only chasing the big LPs, ignoring investors who don't look obvious on paper and getting discouraged by a slow start" is the biggest mistake fund managers make.

---

6. Overlooked Insights

Insight 1: Speed of Deployment as a LP Relationship Signal

Nomi had deployed over $20M across six companies before the fund even closed — a subtle but important data point. Rapid deployment signals deal access and conviction, and likely served as a live proof point during late-stage LP conversations rather than a post-close feature.

"Fund I closed in April 2026 with over $20M already deployed across six companies, including Firehawk Aerospace and Starfish Space."

Insight 2: ESG/Ethical Restrictions as a Persistent Structural LP Barrier in Defense

The top LP objection wasn't valuation, team inexperience, or track record — it was sector ethics. A meaningful portion of the LP universe has blanket policies against defense investing, representing a durable segmentation of the capital base that defense fund managers must pre-qualify around.

Top reason LPs said no: "Sector: 'We don't invest in defense.'"