Teahose.
SIGN IN
NEW HERE — WHAT TEAHOSE DOES
We read the entire AI & tech firehose — so you don't have to.
PODPodcastsAll-In, No Priors, Acquired…
NEWNewslettersStratechery, Newcomer…
PAPPapersPhysical AI research
PHProduct Huntdaily launches
VCInvestor ScoutSequoia, a16z, Benchmark…
CLAUDE DISTILLS →
7 reads, 30 sec each — free, 6 AM ET.
+ a live graph of the companies, people & themes underneath.
HOME/MORE OR LESS/AI Wearables Are Coming: Rings,…
POD
// EPISODE
MORE OR LESS

AI Wearables Are Coming: Rings, Earrings, Glasses

DATE November 14, 2025SOURCE MORE OR LESSPARTICIPANTS UNKNOWN HOST, SAM, BRIT, JESS, DAVEREGION WESTERN
// KEY TAKEAWAYS3 ITEMS
  1. 01The Rise of AI Wearables and the Future Beyond Phones
  2. 02Apple's True Innovation Strategy: Miniaturization for Future Wearables
  3. 03The Financialization of Lawfare and Its Asymmetric Impact

1. Key Themes

The Rise of AI Wearables and the Future Beyond Phones

The panel extensively discussed the emerging category of AI-powered wearable devices, particularly rings, as the next major computing platform. Sam Altman revealed his inbox is "full of startups working on various types of rings that you can use to interact with AI" [00:08:44]. He explained the thesis: "the AI computing device on the edge that's using inference to interact with you is going to be the thing" [00:08:38]. Dave noted the specific use case driving this: "I increasingly using my phone to record notes, record reminders, record, you know, all that, how I feel. And I don't want to pull out my phone to do that" [00:09:40]. Sam predicted users will likely have "two" rings - "you've got health and probably AI interface" [00:11:32].

Apple's True Innovation Strategy: Miniaturization for Future Wearables

While the iPhone Air appeared to flop, Sam provided a contrarian take on Apple's strategy. He suggested "the air was actually an exercise in miniaturizing and moving their silicon and surrounding PCB stacks to be extremely small. And that this is like a road sign on the way towards what they're going to be doing with wearables next" [00:07:48]. He added that "the technology that went into the air will likely end up in the glasses or whatever it is" [00:08:02]. This reframes the "failure" as R&D for future products.

The Financialization of Lawfare and Its Asymmetric Impact

Brit introduced a critical insight about the legal system's evolution: "When you really get down to the law and financializing it, which is totally what's happening...There is this problem, which is it's extremely asymmetric against the defendant, right? So like, it's very easy to sue people and the cost of defense is really high" [00:53:14]. He's made "two investments the last 10 days in law fair" [00:52:42] and warned: "no one's really balanced or played out the equation well, such that it financially doesn't make sense to sue someone, right? And so we basically just have a system that's going to spin towards more and more lawsuits over everything because that's the financial incentive of the whole thing" [00:53:56].

2. Contrarian Perspectives

Humanoid Robots Are Today's VR (2011) - A Bad Investment

Sam strongly pushed back against humanoid robot investments: "Nobody should work on humanoids" [00:24:20]. He elaborated: "it seems clear that humanoids, the idea of humanoids is somewhat akin to where VR was in call it 2011 or 2012" [00:24:28]. Drawing on his portfolio company experience with someone who "worked on the humanoid at Tesla, worked on all of the factory lines for the Model 3, the Model Y, the Cybertruck," Sam noted they "are not optimistic that humanoid application in business or...consumer being an actual real thing that's coming" [00:24:44]. He warned: "I'm quite concerned that a lot of people are just investing in VR in 2011 right now, and there's going to be a lot of money lost" [00:25:38].

Multitasking Is Cognitively Expensive - Most Things Don't Deserve Full Attention

Brit argued: "almost nothing in life is worth your full attention...there's all these things in life that you just have to do. And like I just think that that if you just accept the fact that look...there are things you should not be multitasking on that do require full attention. But I think it's also okay to embrace the fact that very little requires your full attention" [00:20:51]. Dave provided medical evidence from his recent concussion: "I'll be in a call like this and I feel great. My head doesn't hurt. And then a text will come in and I'll click over to the text and I get a throbbing headache. And so I take that as proof of the cerebral load of multitasking" [00:21:53].

Substack-Style Independent Journalism Cannot Survive Legal Threats

Brit delivered a critical perspective on the economics of journalism: "this is one of the really strong anti-substack theories, which is like, you can't as an individual support these lawsuits. Like, you can't afford it. It's actually quite expensive to be in the news gathering...if you're going to do it, you better have the pockets and be ready to go to war, which means news and good information is more expensive because, not because of the cost of the information, because of the cost of defending it" [00:55:43]. Dave quantified this from his own experience: his time defending journalism went "from two hours a month to two hours a week" in the "last six months" [00:56:32].

Ideas Arise Everywhere Simultaneously - Not Individual Genius

Sam referenced the Tealet P Tapes podcast's exploration of creativity: "ideas are living beings or that they kind of they do actually arise everywhere all at once. And that people seem to tap into them" [00:10:31]. He observed this pattern in his inbox with AI ring companies and noted: "the use case you just described just is very clearly something that a lot of people are focused on right now" [00:11:14], suggesting innovation is memetic rather than individualistic.

3. Companies Identified

Soren (Stealth/Security)

Description: Home security company co-founded by Sam Altman and Kevin Hartz, focused on creating actual deterrence rather than passive monitoring.

"Sam, it's a company that I co-founded with Kevin Hartz and he's listed as a co-founder. Yeah, I don't talk about it super publicly" [00:26:24]. Sam explained their approach: "when we were starting this company, we did a lot of research with various components of the military, how the military thinks about gathering data, making decisions, choosing what action to take, you know, how to deter threats...how do you then apply that to home security is like a really interesting, I think a really interesting problem" [00:28:10].

Janitor AI

Description: Platform for romantic/explicit AI chatbot interactions, positioned as fiction for women.

Dave described it as "a platform for romanticcy" [00:48:30] and noted "the app is insanely popular, which will surprise no one. And like, you know, I forgot, like some traffic thing had them like fifth in the like Gen AI category" [00:48:54]. The company argues that "explicit chat with characters is not something that should be banned, but it or worried about, but is instead in the long line of fiction and women in particular have been gravitating towards this from some time" [00:48:40].

Hollyland (Mic)

Description: Creator-focused audio equipment company making wireless microphones for content creators.

Jess demonstrated their product: "this is my new mic...It's called the Hollyland mic...all the creators are using, by the way, because they have to do like walk-in talk video" [00:31:05].

4. Operating Insights

Email Removal Strategy for Executive Focus

Dave discussed removing email from his phone following the example of Melanie Perkins, CEO of Canva, who "swears by this" [00:17:47]. He justified it: "I am surrounded by computers. This isn't like, it's not like I'm going to be...people can call me and call me if they really need me" [00:17:22]. This tactical decision recognizes that constant email access creates interruption without providing real accessibility for urgent matters.

Pre-Budget Legal Defense for Content Companies

Dave revealed a critical operational insight about managing legal exposure: "every three months, I'm like, up the budget, up the budget, because we're not going to back down up the budget" [00:57:14]. He quantified the escalation: time spent on legal defense went from "two hours a month" to "two hours a week" over six months [00:56:32]. For any company in content or journalism, budgeting 4-8x historical legal costs appears necessary in the current environment.

5. Overlooked Insights

The iPhone's Silent Battery Victory as Competitive Moat

Sam observed something that "doesn't enter your consciousness": "I actually rarely run it down" [00:07:00] regarding his iPhone Pro battery. He noted "that's like one of those interesting things that you don't notice, but it just happened. And now it's normal" [00:07:06]. This seemingly minor achievement - all-day battery life without user awareness - represents a massive competitive advantage that enables Apple to "thumb your nose in AI" [00:06:00] as Brit noted, because they've solved the fundamental constraint (power) that will limit AI wearables and devices. The fact that users stopped thinking about battery life is perhaps the most powerful product achievement - solving a problem so completely it disappears from consciousness.

Etiquette School as Emerging Market for Global Founders

What started as an apparently humorous concept revealed genuine demand with global implications. Brit mentioned receiving requests "from all over the planet to come run etiquette schools in various cities...We have an agent request. We have a Middle Easter request. We have several in Europe" [00:38:55]. Jess observed: "I actually think your market is quite larger outside of the US than inside the US for Silicon Valley etiquette" [00:39:16]. This suggests a real information asymmetry where international founders lack tacit knowledge about Silicon Valley norms, creating genuine economic disadvantage. The willingness to pay for this knowledge indicates it's not just cultural curiosity but competitive necessity. The insight: cultural capital transfer is becoming a bottleneck in global startup ecosystems.